Tag: update

Apple vs Samsung: an explanation and an in-depth look with the latest updates

Since Apple sued Samsung in the US in April last year — and Samsung sued Apple in return in Japan, Korea and Germany — the Apple vs Samsung feud has been under keen watch in tech circles around the world.

While we have, inevitably, seen people taking sides, we have also seen several funny memes and other, more serious, discussions for both sides. And there are enough grounds to justify all of them.

[hr_padding] [notice type=”green”] This article is also available as a .pdf file for you to carry around and read at your leisure. Right click here and save link as… 

[/notice] [hr_padding]
Apple sues fridge for looking like an iPad

Image courtesy, original artist/s: as seen on TechlineInfo

In this article we will take a look at what exactly the biggest lawsuits are all about so you can make an informed decision before picking sides (you know you want to!) We will see what Apple and Samsung are fighting over, in common man’s language; what is at stake here; and how, as the two biggest technological companies in the world battle it out, the rest of us turn out to be the biggest losers.

If you are legally inclined, you can also read the latest lawsuit filed by Apple, Inc., but it’s alright, because we will be talking enough about that right here!

Here is a nice quote of the late (and awesome) Steve Jobs, to begin with:

We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas

— Steve Jobs, ex-CEO of Apple


How it got here: a very brief but interesting history

Back in April of 2011, Apple, Inc. moved a North California district court against Samsung Electronics Co., on three (among other) major charges: trademark infringement, unfair competition and unjust enrichment (meaning Samsung was benefited technologically — yes, we all know they really mean monetarily — by the efforts that Apple put in because Samsung copied Apple.)

As you can see, these are pretty huge accusations and Samsung was not one to keep quite. CEO Lee Kun-hee of the South Korean electronics giant led the charge and his company filed suits against Apple in Japan, Korea and Germany less than a fortnight later. They would eventually go on to with two of the cases and lose in Germany.

However, by then Apple had lost their first case as the evidence they had supplied was proved to have been tampered with. It included two images, one of the old iPhone 3GS and one of its contemporary Galaxy S, side-by-side; but the image had been resized to make them look exactly similar in all ways.

A couple of months later, Samsung filed more lawsuits: they had approached the British high court, the Delaware district court and the US International Trade Commission (ITC) by June of 2011.

At the heart of all these cases was really a simple truth: the United States being the largest consumer of gadgets from either company, it mattered little who won a case elsewhere. The verdicts that mattered had to come from courts in the United States and Apple had a clean upper hand here (although no juror would like to confess to this,) what with Apple being an American company.

It soon turned out to be true and Samsung began losing a whole slew of cases in the US, one after another. But what exactly were these companies fighting about?


Apple vs Samsung: Design patents

There are several things from its devices — hardware and software alike — that Apple seems to strongly believe Samsung has knowingly copied. Let us take a look at the most important of the lot.


Body design

Apple Patent Body Design_VHBelvadi

Fig 1

This one has perhaps been making the biggest circles around the internet.

Apple has a patent that protects a doodle they made about their iPhone (see Fig 1.) Perhaps it isn’t a doodle, and is more of a fairly accurate design, but the factors in play here are that this level of depiction is all the patent office needs and this actually patents a lot: the shape, the corners, the steel rim and the button layout.

And below it you see the Samsung Galaxy phone they have filed a case about (Fig 2.)

What is the moral of the story? If you are ever making a phone, make sure it is not rectangular, longer lengthwise, does not have rounded corners, does not have steel surrounding it anywhere, and, not to mention, no buttons at the bottom centre. Right now, Apple owns exclusive rights to all that courtesy of an ingenious US patent office.

Apple Patent Body Design Samsung_VHBelvadi

Fig 2

I am not an Apple-hater, and you can feel free to erase out the last bit you read, but that is the hard truth in lay man’s terms. Refer Apple’s D790, D016 and D677 patents for a legal version of what I just said.

It gets worse from here on.

[P.S. We will talk more about body design in the Trade Dress section of this article later.]



Another important ground on which Apple is suing Samsung is its use of icons. Once again, like the body design, there seems to be an outright grant of exclusive rights here too.

Continue reading

This is what Facebook is for!

The social world online, I believe, is divided into three categories: Facebook fanatics (who live half their lives on Facebook,) Facebook users (who know their limits,) and Facebook ignorant (Facebook? What is that?)

I watched The Social Network seven months after it was released (I got my hands on it only in May!) and thought the film was interesting and well-laid. The screenplay was Oscar-worthy but most of the story was made up–except Zuckerberg’s wardrobe which, he said himself, the film had portrayed correctly every single time. But the point in a film is that it has to entertain and The Social Network did its job well.

Who would have expected now, three years after the incidents in the film, that Facebook would become so entertaining to people? Read more →

First weblog report of 2011

In my five years as a blogger, I have noticed a remarkable trend in gaining readers: I get more readers, in spurts, over the year. They do not die down often–indeed that has only ever happened thrice as far as I can recall–and this phenomenon I attribute to my habit of providing my existing readership a quarterly update on everything new on my weblog. This practice I have not observed anywhere in the blogosphere, an active participant of which, it is needless to mention, I am.

The report, should any of you fancy pinging my blog for it at some point of time, is, you must understand, short and to the point; it gives the readers the bare facts of development that have taken place since the last such report. I leave out dwelling upon my jumping between website addresses, which, I cannot deny, has cost me dearly in terms of readership. Read more →